grumman tiger vs cessna 172

Click If your club is looking for an economical aircraft that can serve as a primary trainer and a solid cross-country platformwith good performance, the Grumman Tiger is a plane you may want to consider. It also has a faster speed and a better range. Cheetahs are around 850lbs. One consideration is that. I am not very tall, and I cannot safely fly early Cessna 172s I need two cushions in order to reach the pedals and see outside clearly, and I once had one of them slip as I was about to land! It includes a touch-and-go,. Our Citabria wasnt re-covered during the time Flying Educators owned it, Greg said. We havent had any major problems with the Tiger., Aero on Demand said annuals without squawks. Krish discussed having to change some avionics, propeller, engine cowling, and after 300 hours of flying him and his partners also had to overhaul the 180hp engine, which cost a whopping $28,000. Bill & Carol Scott, who own the high-compression STC, don't have the resources to do the full testing and certification protocol themselves, so the modified Cheetah is artificially limited to 157 hp to conform to the original specs. There should be few problems with maintenance for either of these aircraft types. I believe the wing is a time life item and the end of the plane. What are real world numbers for these two at 75%? Or you might prefer the Grumman AA5B, or perhaps the Diamond DV20/DA20 Katana, Ercoupe 415-C, or Diamond DA40 Star, all of which are said to be safe and easy to fly. It is about the same in terms of safety as other similar light aircraft. Aircraft Spotlight: Comparing the Citabria and the Grumman Tiger, FAA publishes 'Aviation Weather Handbook'. Since it is a tube and fabric airplane, its best to keep it in a hangar. You should know that, despite the above, there are possibly more similarities than differences between the Cessna 172 and the Cessna 150. I have a bunch of time in the Cheetah and a friend has a Traveller with the 160hp-not 160hp STC - great little planes. FletchAir down at Boerne Stage (5C1) is the regional guru of Grumman. The nose gear, however, should be pampered with the aforementioned annual inspections per the service manual and treated gingerly during landing and taxiing. Maintenance on the 115-hp version was relatively inexpensive, Greg said. It continued to look good until it was sold. Im giving you the credit you deserve, http://precisionengine.home.mindspring.com/4plstc.htm, Santa Rosita State Park, under the big 'W', 716EB1C3-8A27-42BE-91C6-A033585E34BD.jpeg, https://www.pilotsofamerica.com/com-a-grumman-tiger-to.81264/page-2#post-1756259, (You must log in or sign up to reply here. So whats not to like? Depending on how much exposure it has to the sun, it will need to be replaced generally about every 25 to 30 years. Very rugged, durable and dependable. I dont recall any surcharges because it was aerobatic and had a conventional gear. The most popular of the Grumman series, the Tiger seats four, has a 180-hp engine, and burns 10 gph. :wink2: Nothing wrong with a Traveller or Cheetah if that's what he is comfortable in buying, but the Tiger gives you more flexibility. Grumman-American, on the other hand, never certified the AA-5x for 160 hp. Flying Educators requires members to already have their Private Pilot Certificate, but Greg would recommend the aircraft as a primary trainer. If your club wants to offer something different yet cost effective, a Citabria can help attract members who want to earn a tailwheel endorsement or do some aerobatic flying. If you had a Tiger without the autopilot, its not going to be quite as stable as a 172 or a 182. When we're not in the air, we're here helping others how to join us here at Aviator Insider. 1. Tiger owner here. That was its strong suit.. The AA-5 series serves as an interesting alternative to the comparable Cessna and Piper models that make up the general aviation fleet. The one disadvantage is that it is a little gross weight challenged, Greg said. Mojogrip online https://mojogrip.net Add me on Instagram https://goo.gl/U7Fcca Add me on Facebook https://goo.gl/rbjE6N Back with the second half of Krish's . I toured all of Europe in one of these, with a friend. She's published several books and articles on all things aviation and is eager to continue sharing her knowledge! Grumman Tiger. If so did he sell it after 2 or 3 years and get into a twin? So which aircraft is better? members wanted an aircraft more suited to that mission. And, if you are doing aerobatics, you need parachutes that need to be repacked regularly, which would add a cost. I have been googling like a mad man learning about them. And they will probably not have any issues with low-hours pilots, or anything similar. Discussion in 'Hangar Talk' started by SixPapaCharlie, Dec 14, 2015. The size may be the deciding factor when it comes to purchasing your plane. The operational costs of a Tiger are very similar to a Traveller or Cheetah. Compared with those from other manufacturers, the Grumman design replaces many of the cables and pulleys with torque tubes. The Cessna 172 is a lot more powerful than the Cessna 150. The AA-5 series serves as an interesting alternative to the comparable Cessna and Piper models that make up the general aviation fleet. To provide a more up-to-date cost perspective, the Wild River Flying Club in Osceola, WI operates a 1979 Citabria with a 150-hp Lycoming O-320. Aero on Demand, a Houston-based club, also operates a Tiger and it is equipped with an engine monitor providing very accurate data. You solo it from thefront so youve got good visibility, and, like the Champ it is derived from, it is an easy, forgiving airplane. Otherwise I can take a photo of the for sale sign at the airport sometime. Useful load on most of Tigers I've seen run in 900-950lb range. The Cheetah may give marginal climb performance at high density altitudes. Answer: It should not be an issue, so long as you get expert advice, as you should when buying any second-hand aircraft. He can be found on Instagram as @cessnateur. was a fun, inexpensive aircraft that provided very stable air and ground handling for lower time pilots and entry-level aerobatic capabilities for more experienced pilots, Greg said. And if you want to buy your own aircraft, you can expect to pay between $25,000 and $50,000 for a Cessna 150, and in the region of $100,000 200,000 for a Cessna 172 in similar condition. I had been learning about 172s. 2. Are they pretty much the same? I did. There is a beautiful Grumman at my airport for sale. Insurance should be similarly straightforward. Grumman-American, on the other hand, never certified the AA-5x for 160 hp. A number of Cheetahs can be found equipped with the 180 hp O-360, which is available as an STC. The Cessna 172 is a lot more powerful than the Cessna 150. Three or four of the 10 members would use it for aerobatics a lot. Greg said. Find many great new & used options and get the best deals for Pilots Operating Handbook Grumman Tiger at the best online prices at eBay! Among thedifferencesare enginesize,with variations from 115 hp to 180 hp, and whether the wing spar is metal or wood. I only have time in the AA1X series, the baby brother of the tiger, the canopy design I think is one of the better ones in GA, no issues, the free castor nose wheel was great for ground handling, nice shock absorbing and strong fiberglass mains, good fuel tank system, etc. Its super tight on the controls. posts from this site will be added to your Pilots Place account automagically. Copyright 2023 Flying Media. ). Former Flying Educators Club Secretary and Treasurer Greg Utley shares his thoughts on both aircraft. The plane cruised at around 115 mph and had about a 20-gallon fuel tank, Greg recalled. Because there are so many of them, and they have been around a long time, there are a large number of mechanics and engineers who are familiar with what needs to be done to keep them in good working order, and obtaining parts for them should not be an issue either; they are easily available, even for the older Cessna 150s. Bede designed the two-place BD-1 with an emphasis on speed and economy, and when it was purchased by American Aviation and developed into the AA-1 series, these qualities were carried over. The Grumman Pilots Association and Grumman Gang are additional resources, and enthusiastic support is available to the owner community in the form of online forums and video tutorials. UBB Message. Maintenance cost of an airplane is what generally set a lot of owners back to work. moved! The main parts supplier for Grumman aircraft is an outfit called Fletch Air, and I think theyre based in Houston, he said. Accordingly, AA-5s are quick to convert a light nudge of the yoke into an instant change in attitude. Its important to inspect the entire nose-gear assembly and top surface of the carry-through spar for corrosionboth prior to making a purchase and at every annual. Before I bought my Grumman Tiger, I was in a flying club and flew a Cessna Cardinal. same friendly, informative place for all things Cessna 172, now with a larger $19.99 . As of this writing, 13 examples are listed at a median price of $48,500, with a median airframe time of 3,500 hours. Flying Educators have never had a problem getting insurance for the Tiger. AA-5 prices can vary widely, but when we exclude the most extreme examples in a recent sampling of listings, the majority fall in the $30,000 to $60,000 range. Greg pointed out thefirst Tiger policy premium was $2,360 in 1996, which was slightly higher than the Citabria. The nosewheel looks flimsy but I spoke to a former Grumman pilot that says they are quite sturdy. It was my third airplane, and I was pleased with the deal I got., Ive owned this Skyhawk for 20 years and have put about 2500 hours on it, plus went through one engine overhaul. Its nimble in the air, seats four, and has a good cruising speed with minimal fuel burn. The lineage began with Jim Bedes homebuilt BD-1, which first flew in 1963. Cheetahs are faster than Tigers. Externally the Tiger looked much like the AA-5 Traveler and AA-5A Cheetah so once again Grumman's marketing department came up with a distinctive decal package to differentiate the design this time a "galloping tiger". Perhaps because they are easy to fly, some pilots complain that both the Cessna 150 and the Cessna 172 are somewhat boring. It will carry four people and luggage, and you have a wide choice, from completely new models to budget-priced much older ones. Just went with a friend to check one out. Insurance for our 1979 Citabria (Model 7-ECA) was $870 in 89 and had risen to $2,195 when we sold it in 95, Greg said. Everybody was used to flyingCitabrias, which as you know is fully aerobatic, Greg said. Private and Commercial helicopter licenses and Instructor Rating were quickly added to her resume. I think the only way I would chose the Traveller of the Gruman line was because I could get a good airframe and avionics package and upgrade to 180hp cheaper than I could buy a Tiger for, and I don't really see that happening. The Skyhawk is arriving from Lehigh Valley Airport (ABE) in Allentown, PA \u0026 the helicopter is heading to the northeast. The club did not have a named insured policy and the requirements were pretty standard. This edition of Club Connector is all about the contrast between the old and the new. include the 150-hp AA5 Traveler and AA5A Cheetah, and the 160-hp GA7 Cougar. You can pay a whole lot less for a Traveler compared to a Tiger, or get a whole lot nicer Traveler for the same money. It's kinda underpowered for what we were doing with it, luckily no one was heavy and the distances weren't far. Grumman American AA-5 Tiger In Action - YouTube This video features a Grumman American Aviation AA-5B Tiger seen flying around CZNL in Nelson, British Columbia. Still, I think the additional climb rate of the Tiger makes it a better choice, even if speed is not a major concern. It burns 7 gph and the clubcharges $86 an hour. Every Cessna 172 or Cherokee 140 I fly with is quickly left in the dust by a good 10 to 15 knots. For a club with a 30-year history flying only. Depends. The Tiger was designed by Grumman engineers and was first produced in late 1974 as the 1975 model. The Main Differences Between the Piper Archer and Cessna 172. The hierarchy of personal general aviation aircraft types has, over the years, come to be defined by certain mainstays. front so youve got good visibility, and, like the Champ it is derived from, it is an easy, forgiving airplane. I am very familiar with both these aircraft types. Hi, Eddie, I'm at KHWO, too! Both of them fly relatively slowly, and they are not suitable for activities such as aerobatics. If you dont have an existing login on the Cessna 172 Club Bill & Carol Scott, who own the high-compression STC, don't have the resources to do the full testing and certification protocol themselves, so the modified Cheetah is artificially limited to 157 hp to conform to the original specs.

Melanie Orlins Measurements, Spero Ut Fidelis, Carly Pearce Band Members, Green Frog Bassinet Recall, For Loop In Withcolumn Pyspark, Articles G